The Process of Conditioning

Florida Sahay Professor Griffin Psychology 1101 Fall 2009 The Conditioning outgrowth It was raining when Sarah was driving home from work. Both she and the driver of the gondola in front of her were speeding. The car in front of her had immediately braked. There was not enough distance between that car and her own car to safely slow to a stop, so she had quickly switched lanes to avoid a car accident. Instead, the slick pavement caused her car to swerve out of control. When her car finally skidded to a stop, it was inches away from colliding into a tree.Two weeks later, Sarah noticed that she had hold up anxious every condemnation she had to drive in the rain. Believe it or not, Sarahs anxiety is collectible to an associative l make watering process called teach. According to Weiten (2008), conditioning involves learning associations between events that occur in an organisms environment (p. 169). Although psychology has a grasp on how we learn through classical and operative conditioning, it is impaired by biological constraints. unmingled conditioning, also referred to as Pavlovian conditioning (Weiten, 2008), was discovered by a Russian physiologist, Ivan Pavlov. This hold of learning presents how an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), or a neutral event, is initially unavailing to evoke an unconditioned solution (UCR), or a reflexive response, but attains the ability to do so by pairing with another stimulus that can elicit such a response. Sarahs maculation would be an example of classical conditioning. The UCS would be Sarahs near-death experience. The UCR from Sarah was anxiety and fear.Now that she feels anxiety and fear every time she must drive when it rains, even if there is no chance of another accident, her reaction has become a conditioned response (CR) to the rain, which is now the conditioned stimulus (CS). Another type of conditioning is operative conditioning. operant conditioning (Weiten, 2008) can be distinguished from classical condi tioning in that classical conditioning explains how manipulations by events occur before the reflexive response, whereas operant conditioning explains how the response is influenced by the following result of an event.The response in operant conditioning is not reflexive, but rather, voluntary. Therefore, according to Weiten (2008), operant conditioning is a form of learning in which voluntary responses come to be controlled by their consequences. Operant conditioning occurs on an mundane basis. It can be identified when a child studies ruffianly to earn good grades, an employee works hard to earn a raise in his/her salary, or even a dog performing tricks to earn a treat.Conditioning was assumed to be applied to any species that could respond to a stimulus. On the contrary, discoveries in new-fashioned decades switch shown that there are limits to conditioning. These limits are due to an organisms biological heritage (Weiten, 2008). born(p) drift is one of the many biological co nstraints. Instinctive drift was first described by the Brelands who were operant psychologists in the business of training tools for commercial purposes (Breland & Breland, 1966 as cited in Weiten, 2008).This occurs when the conditioning process is hindered by an animals response due to innate predispositions. For example, a dog can be trained to add a stick, but if the dog is presented with a bone, the dog would most likely run off someplace to bury the bone. This is because of the dogs innate food- preserving behavior. As stated by Michael Domjan (2005 as cited in Weiten, 2008), organisms concord developed distinctive response systems to deal with vital tasks and survival skills over the course of evolution.The principal fit of psychologists today on learning is that learning mechanism among different species are analogous, but some of these mechanisms have been altered due to the demands of the organisms environment. Theories of conditioning did not allocate the role of co gnitive processes until new decades. Edward C. Tolman and his colleagues (Tolman & Honzik as cited in Weiten, 2008) developed an experimentation in which they used three convocations of rats. All three groups were to run through a complicated maze. Group A was rewarded food daily when they were able to get to the devastation of the maze.Group B did not receive any food and group C was rewarded food on their eleventh trial. Group A showed a much improvement in a short course of time (approximately seventeen days) due to the reinforcement. Group B and C, however, showed little improvement over the course of 10 days. later on the 11th trial, group C showed a drastic improvement and even exceeded group A. Tolman determined that the rats in group C have been learning the maze just as much as group A. The motivation of the reward seemed to increase group Cs potential.He termed this as latent learning, which is dormant companionship that an organism has, but does not express until it is needed. Later on in the study of psychology, cognitive factors were compound into the study of conditioning. A major theme during the study of conditioning was nature vs. nature (Weiten, 2008). Behavioral traits were image to be explained through environmental factors, but the recent decades of evidence from the study of classical and operant conditioning has proved that the process of conditioning is impaired by biological constraints.Heritage and the environment once again dispute the theories of nurture when influencing behaviors in organisms. Child-care facilities, schools, factories, and major businesses have all been applied with principles of conditioning in order to improve. Classical and operant conditioning has been a significant contribution and has had a major influence to society.References Weiten, W. (2008). Psychology Themes & variations briefer interpretation (7th ed. ). Belmont, CA Wadsworth.